![]() Dordrecht: Springer.īrumberg-Chaumont, J. Roques (Eds.), The language of thought in the late middle ages: Essays in honor of Claude Panaccio. Causation and mental content: Against the externalist reading of Ockham. William Ockham on the scope and limits of consciousness. Philosophers Imprint, 12, 1–29.īrower-Toland, Susan. Medieval approaches to consciousness: Ockham and Chatton. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 24, 317–335.īrower-Toland, Susan. Intuition, externalism, and direct reference in Ockham. Oxford: Clarendon Press.īrower-Toland, Susan. Logic and logicians in pre-reformation Scotland. Braakhuis (Eds.), The commentary tradition on Aristotle’s ‘de generatione et corruptione’. Knowledge, signification and (natural) supposition in Buridan’s questions on De generatione et corruptione. Scientific knowledge and contingent reality. Boulnois (Ed.), Généalogies du sujet, de Saint Anselme à Malebranche (pp. Ego ou cogito? Doute, tromperie divine et certitude de soi, du XIVe au XVIe siècle. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 2, 21–37.īoulnois, Olivier. ![]() Bonaventure: The Franciscan Institute.īoler, John. Buyaert (Ed.), Collected articles on Ockham (pp. The realistic conceptualism of William of Ockham. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.īiard, Joël. Pasnau (Ed.), The Cambridge history of late medieval philosophy (pp. ![]() Le langage mental du Moyen Âge à l’Âge classique. Lahteenmaki (Eds.), Consciousness: From perception to reflection in the history of philosophy (pp. Intention and presence: The notion of presentialitas in the fourteenth century. Logique et théorie du signe au XIVe siècle. Biard (Ed.), Itinéraires d’Albert de Saxe (pp. Simple supposition in William of Ockham, John Buridan and Albert of Saxony. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2010 Edition).īerger, H. ![]() Copenhagen: Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters.Īydede, Murat. Topics in the language sciences, 1300–1700 (pp. Singular terms and singular concepts: From Buridan to the early sixteenth century. London: Variorum reprints, 1985.Īshworth, J. Ashworth, Studies in Post-Medieval Semantics. Mental language and the unity of propositions: A semantic problem discussed by early sixteenth century logicians. Logic and language in the post-medieval period. Kobusch (Eds.), Philosophical debates at Paris in the early fourteenth century (pp. Realism and intentionality: Hervaeus Natalis, Peter Aureolo, and William Ockham in discussion. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.Īmerini, Fabrizio. For the relation between Ockham’s doctrine and James of Viterbo’s, see Antoine Côté’s chapter in this volume.Īdams, M. Henry of Harclay is often quoted as a predecessor of Ockham. Calvin Normore ( 1987, 207) claims that medieval nominalism is not so much a stance on the question of the ontological status of universals as “a position about what makes sentences true.” The sources of Ockham’s and Buridan’s nominalism are not well known. Buridan is less parsimonious than Ockham since he admits an ontological category that Ockham does not accept, namely modes. For Ockham’s denial of the extra-mental existence of numbers, see Roques ( 2016b). See also Spade ( 1999) and Klima ( 2011a). For an overview of Ockham’s ontology, see Adams ( 1987, cc. He denies the reality not only of universals, but also of abstracta including propositions (as they are nowadays conceived), state of affairs, and numbers. Ockham generally allows only concrete, particular substances and some qualities. The second part of the introduction briefly describes the chapters of the present volume and explains their organization. We describe the current state of scholarship in five main areas: (1) the mental language hypothesis in general and in the work of William of Ockham in particular (2) the comparison of Ockham to John Buridan (1295/1300–1358/61), another leading figure in the first half of fourteenth century, on mental language and related semantic issues (3) situating Ockham within a broader context by examining themes in mental language in other philosophers both preceding and following him (4) developments in Ockham’s semantics and its connection to concept formation and cognitive psychology (5) the relationship, if any, between mental language and nominalism. The first part includes an overview of the state of the art on mental language as a key topic and tool in the philosophical analyses of the fourteenth century. The introduction to this volume is divided into two parts.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |